We have collected the most relevant information on Audiophile Myths Head Fi. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Dispelling Popular Audio Myths - Ethan Winer
http://ethanwiner.com/myths.html#:~:text=Myth%3A%20Using%20audiophile%20speaker%20cables%20improves%20the%20sound%2C,can%20possess%20is%20low%20resistance%20at%20audio%20frequencies.
Testing audiophile claims and myths - Head-Fi
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/
This is a very well done large scale ABX test. A similar set up to Head-fi where four mains cables including 2 kettle leads (stock power cords …
Testing audiophile claims and myths | Page 989 - head-fi.org
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/page-989
This is a perfect example of a claim that should be tested with regards to audiophile myths. To assert obvious differences with "better behaved treble Utopias" and "improved staging capabilities" from a properly functioning digital source is absurd and requires additional explanations to understand and validate.
Testing audiophile claims and myths | Page 992 - head-fi.org
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/page-992
Headphones: Audeze LCD-2,Audeze LCD2 Closed, Massdrop Focal Elex, Mr Speakers Aeon Flow Closed, Sennheiser HD650, HD580 (modded), HD595, Grado SR-325. Photo-Fi: Canon 5Dmk4, bunch of L lenses and light setups. Jan …
Testing audiophile claims and myths | Page 2 - Head-Fi
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/page-2
164. There is no doubt sighted tests reveal more differences than blind and that there are issues with ABX/blind testing. But those who say there are differences, I can hear them, need to work harder to be convincing. I say that more about cables than amps and certainly sources, of which I have found no blind tests with one exception, bit rates ...
Testing audiophile claims and myths | Page 986 - head-fi.org
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/testing-audiophile-claims-and-myths.486598/page-986
The first post is the biggest source of audiophile blind tests I know of. For actual research, they usually have a better understanding of electricity and human psychology, so they won't even get into something ambiguous or massively pointless even under the best circumstances(I say that and then I read something about the poop of that one super rare …
Dispelling Popular Audio Myths - Ethan Winer
http://ethanwiner.com/myths.html
Myth: Even though people cannot hear frequencies above 20 KHz, it is important that audio equipment be able to reproduce higher frequencies to maintain clarity. Fact: There is no evidence that a frequency response beyond what humans can hear is audible or useful. It is true that good amplifier designs generally have a frequency response well beyond the limits of hearing, and …
Audio engineers, what audiophile myths can you confirm …
https://www.quora.com/Audio-engineers-what-audiophile-myths-can-you-confirm-or-bust
The myth that some people seem to believe that human hearing is a reliable measuring device. Equal-loudness contour - Wikipedia Also, many problems of sound in rooms caused by comb filtering are attributed to other things. Move 1/2″ in a room and response can change dramatically. Comb filter - Wikipedia 533 views View upvotes Eric Vonvaltier
The Audiophile Myths and delusions thread | AnandTech ...
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/the-audiophile-myths-and-delusions-thread.2466310/
A lot of audiophiles will tell you that a modern sound card cannot "properly" drive a set of good headphones. They admit the sound card has plenty of power for the cans and that volume will be...
Now you know Audiophile Myths Head Fi
Now that you know Audiophile Myths Head Fi, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
