We have collected the most relevant information on Cambridge Audio 840c Vs Marantz. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Cambridge Audio 840c vs. Marantz SA ... - Audiogon Marketplace
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/cambridge-audio-840c-vs-marantz-sa-8001
Cambridge Audio 840c vs. Marantz SA 8001? I own an SA-8001 and really like it, but I'm wondering what the differences are between the SA 8001 and the Cambridge Audio 840C. (I know about the reviews and cost for both, but I'm looking for a direct comparison.)
Cambridge Audio 840C vs. Marantz SA-8001? | …
https://www.stereophile.com/content/cambridge-audio-840c-vs-marantz-sa-8001-1
Joined: Dec 12 2007 - 5:34am. Re: Cambridge Audio 840C vs. Marantz SA-8001? I've had the 840C for a while and I'm one of the few who didn't care much for it. The music had less rhythmic propulsion and color than some players costing less than it, i.e. Opera Consonance CD120 Linear, or even, Sony Playstation SCPH-1001.
Marantz SA-15S1 vs Cambridge 840C - Head-Fi
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/marantz-sa-15s1-vs-cambridge-840c.445764/
I can get the Marantz SA-15S1 used (only packed out of box, 1 month) for 1190$. The Cambridge 840C will cost me 1585$, brand new. Notice that the prices in Denmark are usually 30% on top of the US prices.
Cambridge Audio Azur 840C CD Player - The Absolute …
https://www.theabsolutesound.com/articles/cambridge-audio-azur-840c-cd-player
The new Cambridge Audio 840C CD player left me shaking my head in wonderment at how Cambridge can sell this much CD player for $1499. The 840C is packed with advanced features, sophisticated technologies, and high-quality parts that one finds in digital products costing upward of $10k.
Build quality: Cambridge Audio or Marantz? | Steve …
https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/build-quality-cambridge-audio-or-marantz.1024771/
Mike from NYC said: ↑. IMHO Marantz is overrated compared to its competition and more $$$$. Saul Marantz has been long gone and after Sony Superscope bought the brand in the mid 60s quality suffered as did sound. In other words - Marantz is no better and no worse than its competition but more $$$.
Cambridge Audio Azur 840c CD Players user reviews : 4.9 ...
http://www.audioreview.com/product/digital-sources/cd-players/cambridge-audio/azur-840c.html
In this respect I consider the 840C inferior to both Krell and Denon and even less expensive players such as the Emotiva ERC2 (best cd player I've heard under $500) and Marantz 8001. Both of these players were smoother and more musically natural than the Cambridge, though neither had the 840's bass slam and the Marantz was brighter on top.
Marantz vs Cambridge audio - AVS Forum
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/marantz-vs-cambridge-audio.2143962/
Discussion Starter · #1 · Sep 21, 2015. Only show this user. Specs don't say it all? While looking for a worthy upgrade to my $500 Marantz SR5003 stumbled across the Cambridge Audio Azur 551. It's needless to say, the MArantz is a consumer AV. CA on the other hand is said to be 'low end of the high-end".
Now you know Cambridge Audio 840c Vs Marantz
Now that you know Cambridge Audio 840c Vs Marantz, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
