We have collected the most relevant information on Conventional Audiometry Results. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Audiometry Screening and Interpretation - American Family ...
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0101/p41.html#:~:text=Screening%20audiometry%20presents%20tones%20across%20the%20speech%20spectrum,test%20or%20a%20threshold%20search%20test%20is%20recommended.
Audiometry Screening and Interpretation - American …
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0101/p41.html
Conventional pure-tone testing is used for adults and older children. ... Audiometry results may be affected in patients with anatomic anomalies, such as narrow or collapsing ear canals (stenosis ...
Conventional Audiometry, Extended High-Frequency ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24719719/
Results: We found that conventional audiometry, extended high-frequency audiometry, low-tone distortion product otoacoustic emission and high-tone distortion product otoacoustic emission had abnormal findings in 29 %, 69 %, 22 %, and 52 % of participants. Most frequently affected frequencies were 4000 and 6000Hz in conventional audiometry, and 14000 and 16000 in …
Extended high-frequency audiometry in subjects exposed …
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18949961/
Conventional audiometry in the frequency range 0.25-8 kHz and EHF audiometry in the frequency range 9-20 kHz were performed. Results: Thresholds in the noise-exposed group were higher than in the control group for both standard and extended high frequencies, but variability was greater in EHF. Larger differences were found in the 4,000-18,000 Hz frequency region, and especially in …
Automated audiometry using apple iOS-based application ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23963611/
Forty-two subjects underwent automated iOS-based hearing testing in a sound booth, automated iOS-based hearing testing in a quiet room, and conventional manual audiometry. Results: The maximum difference in sound intensity between various Apple device and headset combinations was 4 dB. On average, 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91%-100%) of the threshold values …
Validity of automated audiometry for hearing ...
https://f1000research.com/articles/10-1277
Other studies report that conventional audiometry and audiometry hearing threshold results show a small difference. 27 Studies in primary school children aged 6-10 years in South Africa report that automated audiometry can correctly identify 87.5% of hearing loss detected using conventional audiometry. 28 Another study in industry reported that the …
Tablet-based tele-audiometry: Automated hearing …
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30269641/
Results: A total of 9.43% of children presented with mild to moderate conductive hearing loss (unilateral or bilateral). Diagnostic values varied among the different hearing screening approaches that were evaluated: sensitivities ranged from 60 to 95%, specificities ranged from 44 to 91%, positive predictive values ranged from 15 to 44%, negative predictive values ranged …
Clinical trial - Tunefork app vs. conventional audiometry
https://www.tunefork.co.il/post/clinical-trail-ongoing
It’s important to note that throughout the course of the clinical trial, we are measuring hearing thresholds at 7 frequencies- 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, and 8000Hz. This, so as to understand the full scope of each participant’s hearing abilities and/or loss, both through conventional audiometry, as well as when using the Tunefork app.
[Conventional audiometry versus cochlear microphone ...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17428410
[Conventional audiometry versus cochlear microphone audiometry]. ... processing of cochlear microphone potentials in hearing studies is currently in the definitive validation phase against results obtained with other objective procedures. The purpose of …
Teleaudiometry as a screening method in school children
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418376/
Hearing thresholds higher than 15 dBHL in conventional pure tone audiometry were considered hearing loss . Notably, in cases of an air-bone gap or abnormal immittance, the result was considered abnormal even if the 15 dBHL thresholds were not exceeded. The sweep audiometry screening classified children as “pass” or “fail”.
Now you know Conventional Audiometry Results
Now that you know Conventional Audiometry Results, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
