We have collected the most relevant information on Nad Or Cambridge Audio. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Cambridge Audio AXA35 Integrated Amplifier: Review ...
https://www.ecoustics.com/reviews/cambridge-audio-axa35-integrated-amplifier/#:~:text=The%20NAD%20has%20a%20bump%20in%20the%20midrange,to%20have%20slightly%20more%20jump%20in%20that%20regard.
NAD vs. Cambridge Audio - Audiogon Discussion Forum
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/nad-vs-cambridge-audio
Cambridge Audio is to Arcam what Volkswagen is to Audi. My older Arcam alpha 8 integrated + 8p bi-amping combo belongs to a league well under the NAD 315bee. The NAD 315 offers more of everything. Arcam is 4x more expensive than NAD, and Cambridge Audio is 2x more expensive than NAD.
NAD or Cambridge Audio? - ecoustics.com
https://www.ecoustics.com/electronics/forum/home-audio/328684.html
The Cambridge is good, but the NADs sound much more expensive, and just about every audio magazine review concurs--see the review of the C325bee/C525bee combo in the February issue of The Absolute Sound which concludes as follows: "NAD's C 325BEE/C 525BEE combo is one of the best bargains in audio today.
Cambridge Audio Azur 651A vs NAD C 356BEE | ⿻ Full Comparison
https://productz.com/en/cambridge-audio-azur-651a-vs-nad-c-356bee/v/PpXrn-6RGYx
Cambridge Audio Azur 651A NAD C 356BEE; Frequency range: 5 - 50000. Edit. 10 - 65000. Edit. Input impedance: 47000.0 Ω ...
Battle of the ~$1000 Amp. NAD vs Cambridge vs Marantz ...
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/battle-of-the-1000-amp-nad-vs-cambridge-vs-marantz.2985628/
Registered. Joined Feb 11, 2018. ·. 1,435 Posts. Discussion Starter · #1 · Jun 21, 2018. Been looking at a new integrated amp around the $1000 range. So far, it seems like the best contenders are the Marantz PM8005/8006, Cambridge CXA80 and the NAD C368. Anyone have any experience with any of these models?
NAD vs Cambridge Integrated Amp : BudgetAudiophile
https://www.reddit.com/r/BudgetAudiophile/comments/mabu4p/nad_vs_cambridge_integrated_amp/
NAD vs Cambridge Integrated Amp I am looking to understand/compare/contrast the NAD 316bee V2 with the Cambridge Audio AXA35. I am powering KEF Q150 in a nearfield set up, and on paper they look pretty similar.
Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs NAD C368 : BudgetAudiophile
https://www.reddit.com/r/BudgetAudiophile/comments/o12giw/cambridge_audio_cxa81_vs_nad_c368/
Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs NAD C368. Close. 3. Posted by 7 months ago. Archived. Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs NAD C368. Looking at these 2 (probably not so budget) integrated amplifiers, the Cambridge being more expensive. Anyone got any experience with any of these 2 integrated amplifiers and have any recommendations as to which one would be a ...
Torn Between NAD C316BEE V2 and Cambridge AXA35 | …
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/torn-between-nad-c316bee-v2-and-cambridge-axa35.26542/
We replaced it with a Yamaha RS201 receiver, which is much more powerful on paper, but have never found a set of adjustments that don't sound anemic. The Yamaha AS301 is better than the RS201, so might not have the same issues. (We will eventually replace the RS201 with either an NAD or Denon integrated amp.
NAD M33 Review - Stereo Magazine
https://stereo-magazine.com/review/nad-m33-review
Road To Perfection – Cambridge Audio recently dropped quite a bombshell. Not in the literal sense, of course, but the newly presented Evo 150 simply has it all and could (r)evolutionize many a living room. STEREO reports to you with the exclusive, worldwide first review! 03/17/2021 NAD C 298 Review
NAD C 316BEE V2 Integrated Amplifier - SoundStage! Access
https://soundstageaccess.com/index.php/equipment-reviews/903-nad-c316bee-v2-integrated-amplifier
NAD’s C 316BEE V2 probably finds its closest competition in Cambridge Audio’s Topaz AM10 integrated amp-DAC ($299.95), in which virtually the same feature set is mated to a slightly weaker amp specified to put out 35Wpc (which means that its maximum undistorted output is 0.6dB lower).
The best stereo amplifiers of the 21st century | What Hi-Fi?
https://www.whathifi.com/us/features/best-stereo-amplifiers-21st-century
2002. NAD C320BEE Tested at £220. NAD made it three wins in a row with the C320BEE. This £220 budget amp was a descendant of the NAD 3020 from 1978, and a clear example of how to produce a perfect performance-per-pound product. We said the C320BEE was a “genuinely stunning amplifier for the money”.
Now you know Nad Or Cambridge Audio
Now that you know Nad Or Cambridge Audio, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
