We have collected the most relevant information on Oss4 Vs Pulseaudio. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Do you prefer ALSA, PulseAudio or Open Sound System (OSS ...
https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=70166&start=60#:~:text=OSS4%20%28with%20vmix0%20enabled%29%20has%20nearly%20everything%20you%27re,and%20we%20shall%20see%20if%20there%20are%20more%29.
OSS4 vs ALSA vs Pusleaudio vs Jack / Multimedia and …
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=48385
Re: OSS4 vs ALSA vs Pusleaudio vs Jack. I see a lot of developers saying good things about OSS API - in fact, OSS API is so better that some of them use ALSA OSS emulation instead of ALSA own API, which is regarded as poorly documented and messy. PulseAudio promisses a lot, but delivers little.
12.04 - How to use OSS instead of PulseAudio? - Ask …
https://askubuntu.com/questions/158110/how-to-use-oss-instead-of-pulseaudio
OSS4 is an alternative for ALSA, not for PulseAudio. I tried OSS4 with ubuntu, the sound is good, perhaps better than ALSA, but i reverted back to ALSA because of a couple of problems: OSS4 does not detect automatically the plugging in of a headphones jack (at least for my audio card) the flash plugin work bad or crashes with OSS4
Noob’s Guide to Linux Audio: ALSA, OSS, and Pulse Audio ...
https://linuxhint.com/guide_linux_audio/
PulseAudio vs. JACK. PulseAudio isn’t the only sound server for Linux. There’s also JACK, which is a recursive acronym for JACK Audio Connection Kit. Whereas PulseAudio was developed with the needs of general Linux users in mind, JACK is intended for DJs and audio professionals, providing real-time, low-latency connections for both audio ...
Do you prefer ALSA, PulseAudio or Open Sound System (OSS ...
https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?t=70166&start=60
OSS4 (with vmix0 enabled) has nearly everything you're likely to use from ALSA + PulseAudio. It doesn't include a network sound server (like pa does), but that's a security advantage (pulse has at least one security vulverability in its history, and we shall see if there are more). It does have per-application volume control and a virtual mixer, which leaves only …
OSS? should PulseAudio die? Sharing speakers | projectsofme
https://projectsofme.wordpress.com/2011/10/11/oss-should-pulseaudio-die-sharing-speakers/
Should Pulseaudio Die? What do you think? Submitted by gfranken on Tue, 12/29/2009 - 16:08 * Linux When I was installing and testing Mandriva 2010 Cooker (new development) releases this last Fall season, I kept having persistent problems with sound. Eventually, the advice in the Mandriva Cooker forum for KDE users became: "Disable …
The Great Linux Debate: Pulse vs DMIX vs Nada | Headphone ...
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/the-great-linux-debate-pulse-vs-dmix-vs-nada.476741/
I also know that my main options are Pulseaudio and Dmix, also potentially Jack. Aaaand I know that on windows, you guys use something called Asio4all (or something like that) ... Arch Linux Forums / OSS4 vs ALSA vs Pusleaudio vs Jack . Share Mar 10, 2010 at 3:17 PM Post #15 of 15 ethan961 Member of the Trade: Bugden Audio. Joined Mar 16, 2008 ...
Pulseaudio or Alsa - Kodi
https://forum.kodi.tv/showthread.php?tid=335170
And OK, if you want to split hair, PulseAudio can be used without ALSA if there is another low level driver in use like OSS4. But it cannot make any sound without. Furthermore, all inputs and outputs provided by ALSA or OSS4 are free to use for anyone, this is not an exclusive privilege of PA sound server.
How to remove PulseAudio and fix sound with ALSA and ...
https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=32725
1. IBM ThinkPad R40, Ubuntu 9.04 with OSS4 (PulseAudio was removed) 2. My old box (of 2001), Ubuntu 9.04 with OSS4 (PulseAudio was removed) 3. My old box (of 2001), Mint 7, ALSA + ESound (PulseAudio was removed) The best performance is with OSS4. No noise, no delay. Fantastic quality. ALSA also works well, and it is perfectly usable.
Lossless in Ubuntu (Question) - Head-Fi
https://www.head-fi.org/threads/lossless-in-ubuntu-question.590634/
Not OSS. OSS4. A very different animal indeed. Unless OSS4 lacks driver support for your soundcard, or you are referring to USB support (which OSS4 currently lacks), there is no disagreement with regards to OSS4 vs. ALSA: OSS4 w/ vmix disabled > ALSA w/ dmix disabled unless you are comparing 'ossplay -R' to 'aplay -D hw:0,0'.
Using sndio in place of pulseaudio | Page 2 | The FreeBSD ...
https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/using-sndio-in-place-of-pulseaudio.60829/page-2
While FreeBSD has in kernel mixing of channels (up to 256 if I recall correctly) with OSS4, with low latency, in kernel space, Linux on the other hand some time ago BEFORE PulseAudio had ONE OSS channel (which often was blocked by WINE) and many ALSA channels.
Now you know Oss4 Vs Pulseaudio
Now that you know Oss4 Vs Pulseaudio, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
