We have collected the most relevant information on Sensitivity And Specificity Of Pure Tone Audiometry. Open the URLs, which are collected below, and you will find all the info you are interested in.
Validity of Pure-Tone Hearing Screening at Well-Child ...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23972735_Validity_of_Pure-Tone_Hearing_Screening_at_Well-Child_Visits#:~:text=The%20sensitivity%20and%20specificity%20of%20pure-tone%20audiometry%20were,of%20follow-up%20after%20referral%20and%20the%20poor%20sensitivity.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Pure-Tone and Subjective ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32073298/
Results Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1-4 kHz in either ear.
Sensitivity and Specificity of Pure-Tone and Subjective ...
https://pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/2019_AJA-19-00053
Sensitivity and specificity of audiometric screening criteria varied, but the highest sensitivity was found for the criterion of > 25 dB HL at 1–4 kHz in either ear. The single self-perception question, “ ¿Cree usted que tiene pérdida de audición?
Validity of pure-tone hearing screening at well-child visits
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19188648/
The sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone audiometry were 50% and 78%, respectively. Conclusion: In light of the increasing burden on physicians to provide preventive care, this study calls into question the value of hearing screening using pure-tone audiometry during well-child visits given the lack of follow-up after referral and the poor sensitivity.
The sensitivity and specificity of wideband absorbance ...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8517731/
The sensitivity of pure tone audiometry using the ABG as an indicator was 17.6%, while the specificity of ABG was 44%. The Chi-squared analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant association ( p = 0.62) between middle ear pathologies as identified by the otorhinolaryngologists analysis and actual diagnosed conductive pathology (conductive and …
Audiometry Screening and Interpretation - American …
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0101/p41.html
handheld audiometers have a sensitivity of 92 percent and a specificity of 94 percent in detecting sensorineural hearing impairment. 16 there are several types of audiometers available, but all...
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20209277/
Results: specificity showed values between 43.5% and 58.5% for HHIE with the different audiometric averages and values between 50% and 63.4% for the HHIE-S. Conclusion: audiometric average pure tone thresholds in the frequencies of 4kHz and 6kHz found in the audiometric assessment did not contribute to the self-reported hearing handicap perception. …
Validation of the use of self-reported hearing loss and ...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22898672/
Hearing ability was assessed using pure tone audiometry. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of both screening tools were compared with pure tone averages (PTAs) greater than 25, 40 and 55 dB hearing level (mild, moderate and severe hearing loss, respectively).
Sensitivity and specificity of three hearing screening ...
https://1library.org/document/q7wn0rnr-sensitivity-specificity-hearing-screening-protocols-school-setting.html
To perform the accuracy analysis, the procedures were analyzed and compared relating the gold standard (pure tone audiometry) with the pass-fail results of each screening procedure
Screening for Hearing Impairment in Older Adults by ...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7655471/
Table 5 compares the results of the smartphone-based audiometry hearing screening test and those of standard pure-tone audiometry. Of the 12 patients with moderate hearing impairment in the better ear (PTA>40 dB hearing loss) documented on standard pure-tone audiometry, 11 had a PTA>40 dB in the smartphone-based audiometry hearing screening test.
Validity of Pure-Tone Hearing Screening at Well-Child ...
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/380860
The sensitivity and specificity of pure-tone audiometry were 50% and 78%, respectively. Conclusion In light of the increasing burden on physicians to provide preventive care, this study calls into question the value of hearing screening using pure-tone audiometry during well-child visits given the lack of follow-up after referral and the poor sensitivity.
Now you know Sensitivity And Specificity Of Pure Tone Audiometry
Now that you know Sensitivity And Specificity Of Pure Tone Audiometry, we suggest that you familiarize yourself with information on similar questions.
